If Brett Kavanaugh applied for a job at my company. (A hiring process blueprint.)

Like many, I’ve been watching the ongoing developments about the future of the United States Supreme Court, and it’s clear to me the process is highly politicized, convoluted, and in no uncertain terms, very dysfunctional. No matter what political beliefs you hold, I imagine nearly everyone can agree the process has been hard to watch. Hard to stomach.

Setting all of the politics and the high dysfunction aside for a moment, I find it interesting to consider how things would play out if Brett Kavanaugh (or someone like him) applied for a job at my company. Here goes.

We have a deep, lengthy application and vetting process for job candidates at Marmoset. Maybe an understatement? It goes something like this:

Step 1: our HR Team reviews and vets candidates, narrowing things down to the top 20 or so. We’re pretty methodical with our application requirements, asking applicants to write an essay and speak to a variety of specific topics, giving us plenty to take in and consider. 

Step 2: the CEO further reviews and vets the top 20 or so candidates, digging deep into the realm of Purpose and Core Values alignment, narrowing things down to the top 5-10 candidates.

Step 3: the Team Leader for the role reviews and vets the remaining candidates, beginning with brief, introductory phone interviews.

Step 4: If you make it past the phone interviews, the next step is a first round of in-person interviews, focusing solely on alignment around our Purpose, our Core Values, and our Virtues. These are group interviews, with candidates appearing side-by-side with other candidates in groups of three — sitting across from three Marmoset employees. The Marmoset employees are selected from a variety of teams and roles, selected for their exemplary demonstration of exhibiting Marmoset’s Purpose, Core Values, and Virtues. Yes, three candidates on one side of the room and three Marmoset employees sitting across from them. It’s a fascinating human experiment. And we use score-carding to be as objective as possible, trying to remove gut feelings and “the feels” from the process.

For almost an hour, these six people engage in a variety of intentional questions and conversations. Then the three Marmoset employees each post up in different rooms, while the candidates do a round-robin rotation, spending about 20 minutes with each of them. Upon completion, the candidates go home and the Marmoset staff debrief together, led by our HR Director, comparing each person’s notes and score cards, eventually answering the question of whether or not they’d recommend each of the candidates to continue forward in the process. Some candidates move forward, some don’t.

Step 5: Next, we have a second round of similar in-person interviews, this time focusing on the specifics and functions of the actual role. These also happen as a group interview, again interviewing candidates in groups of three, interviewing with three Marmoset employees who work on the team we’re hiring for. As always, we use score-carding to be as objective as possible. Some move forward, some don’t.

Step 6: The final step in our process is identifying finalists and meticulously checking their references. Sometimes we end up with as many as 3 finalists, though often it’s one or two. If you succeed the reference checks, the Team Leader (hiring manager), with input and support from the HR Director, makes their case for their top candidate, and the CEO make the final approval.

Clearly we subscribe to the “be slow to hire” approach. And in case it’s not clear, at my company Core Values and Virtues trump talent and experience. This has been paramount to our success in hiring some of the best people on the planet. Props to Patrick Lencioni for teaching me that. His books The Five Dysfunctions of a Team and The Ideal Team Player are leadership masterpieces for getting super clear about people.

It’s also worth noting, that throughout our entire application and candidating process we work to follow the Topgrading methodology, using score-carding of candidates in an attempt to be as objective as possible, in what can often be a “feeling-based,” subjective process. I’m also a big fan of hiring methods outlined in the book “Who” by Geoff Smart and Randy Street.

Okay. So if Brett Kavanaugh was a candidate for a role at Marmoset, he probably wouldn’t make it through the first two steps of our process, because “humility” is one of our Core Virtues, and clearly Mr. Kavanaugh doesn’t rate very high in terms of humility.

But if he did somehow make it to the third step of our process — the phone interview, I can’t imagine any of our Team Leaders (who’d be hiring for the role) would approve of him, as he clearly comes off as arrogant, angry and entitled. We’ve all witnessed this on live TV. RIght? These qualities would not be welcome at our organization.

That said, if he somehow found some way to “perform well” for the phone interview, there’s no way he’d survive the in-person group interviews, because… well, because we’ve all seen how he does in person. Enough said. 

bk.jpg

Now let’s skip to the end of our process, and just for fun, let’s hypothetically say that somehow, by miracle or otherwise, Mr. Kavanaugh makes it to the reference check part of the process. And now let’s insert the real life scenario of candidate Kavanaugh — someone shares an allegation of sexual assault. And then, not just one person, but more people speak up, sharing similar allegations and experiences. 

Clearly, this is a no-brainer. I don’t care how qualified or talented someone is — if you’ve got sexual assault allegations of any kind, you’re done. Arrogance, anger, entitlement and politics aside — it’s game over the second someone mentions sexual assault. No judge or jury or due process needed. Remember, this is a job interview — not a court of law. Nothing needs to be proven here. If one single person, let alone several people, come forward to share experiences of sexual assault, you’re not getting the job. You’re not getting any more of our time. Byeeeeee.

So why on Earth is an asshole like Brett Kavanaugh being considered for the United State Supreme Court? 

Good question. Sadly, I think the answer is best summed-up here.

If you don’t have 5 minutes to read the essay, here’s the jist of it:

“On Thursday, a man who has been accused of sexual misconduct by two women, and who has been nominated for a position on the Supreme Court by a President accused of sexual misconduct by twenty women, will attempt to persuade eleven Republican men that he deserves that position—a position that would give him the authority to help decide, among other things, what options are available to women if they get pregnant after being sexually assaulted.”

The sad, discouraging truth of the matter is, the white supremacy patriarchy still stands strong in the United States of America. For now anyways…

Which brings me to this brilliant Tweet a friend shared with me this week:

revolt.jpg

Let’s revolt.

- RW

Purpose and Time

Purpose and Time are two very connected concepts for me. While time is infinite as a universal element or concept, time is finite for humans. Time is the only resource in the entire universe one can never get more of, no matter how hard you try, no matter how privileged or lucky you may be. When one day or one hour or even one of life's precious moments passes — it’s gone forever. You can never get it back. You can never make or manufacture more time. 

And so I wonder —  why aren’t we more intentional with our time? Why don’t we aim to make our time spent roaming this planet, among our friends, our loved ones and our community, deeper, more meaningful, and more impactful? Why do I spend more time seeing live music than I do working on a plan and purpose for my life? Why do I spend more time watching sports than I do planning out the year ahead for me and my family? What's going on? And what does it mean? 

From the earliest age I can remember, I lived my life in one of two modes: survival mode or bootstrap mode. Growing up in a dysfunctional family, with varying degrees of drama and abuse on the regular, survival mode and bootstrapping was how I learned to navigate the world. My biological father was (and still is) absent — a lifetime addict, narcissist, and just not a safe person for me. My mother spent her life in super co-dependent relationships. As it turns out, she lived her life with a closet full of secrets. And later in life, as the secrets eventually came out, she unraveled. Amidst her co-dependency, secrets and dysfunction, she drank herself to death. I had a couple of step fathers too. Both were abusive, but in different ways. One was more physical and at times pretty scary, while the other was mostly just loud and threatening. Fun stuff. 

Thankfully I did have two amazing sets of grandparents who all lived nearby and were very involved in my childhood and early life.  My grandparents, and a few others, were a light for me. They gave me a sense of safety and hope. They modeled strong values and they encouraged me to be great.

All of this to say — the idea of having a purpose for my life wasn’t anywhere on my radar. I was trying to not get hit in the face while eating dinner. The idea of having a purpose never even entered my mind… and I would wager there’s a lot of kids out there like me.  I mean, I didn’t take SAT or ACT tests in high school. I honestly believed community college was the only option for me. That’s literally what my mom and step dad told me. But I digress. 

The truth is, I’ve come to realize that I’ve lived most of my life, or at least the first 35 plus years of it, without any real purpose or intention. It’s hard to have purpose when survival and bootstrapping is all you know.  And as I reflect back today, I see my first 35 years sort of like a boat without a rudder. I was headed in various directions and trying really, really hard to do stuff — but I was getting blown around by the winds of circumstance and I was getting carried here and there by the currents of life. I woke up each day, going through the motions of life, doing most of the things I thought I needed to do — but without any real plan or purpose. Simply put, I had some dreams — some dreams about what I wanted to do with my life. But dreams without an actual plan are just dreams. 

And so about a year ago I decided to get serious about this stuff. Over the past 12 months I’ve devoted most of my time and focus to developing and understanding who I am, and more specifically, what my core values and my highest purpose are. I’ve gone so deep into this stuff that I recently created an operating manual for my life. Sounds pretty nerdy, right? 

The operating manual is a relatively simple, two page document, where I declare who I am and outline my state of being. It includes a Purpose statement, clearly describing my highest level of intention. I’ve also developed my own core values to help act as a compass and help guide important decisions I have to make. I’ve created a list of the key activities and disciplines I need to regularly practice in order to be healthy, well, and to be in “good” operating condition. Things like how much sleep and exercise I need, and how much time away in nature with my family I need, how much alone time I need, meditation, etc. It also has a few photos of Jeana and the kids, for the full visualization effect. Like this:

The operating manual also includes a brief, two paragraph bio, describing my history — my upbringing, how my operating system was initially programmed when I was a child, what my journey has been like thus far, and what I intend to change and do differently, as I grow and evolve forward in life.

And lastly, I’ve made a list of a few things I want to do or accomplish during my existence on this planet — a bucket list, for lack of better words. Things like run half marathons, slay big fish with a fly rod, write a book that helps people, build a company that contributes positivity and good to the community and to the world. I also want to see my grandchildren graduate from college (while holding Jeana's hand), and live abroad for a year with Jeana. Raising two kids into healthy, functional, wise, free thinking and independent adults is also at the top of my list.

And if that isn’t nerdy enough for you, I spend 3-5 minutes reading this operating manual — every single day. It’s the first thing I do every morning. It helps me get centered and focused for the day ahead and gives me intention for what I will do with my day.

For more than 30 years I never thought much about these sort of things — purpose, intention, and the interconnectedness of purpose and time. But now I find myself a little older, and maybe a little wiser, and I have this new awareness of how finite time truly is. And I have this new realization that living life without purpose and intention is sort of like hiking without a trail, or traveling without a destination. 

And so I’ve installed a rudder on this boat — and I look forward to all of the possibilities, experiences and destinations I intend to explore. 

A smart person once said, “If you talk about it, it’s a dream. If you envision it, it’s possible. But if you schedule it, it’s real.” 

Keep it real, y’all. 

RW

--> This essay is part of a new series published in collaboration with The Western Writers League. It would mean a lot to me if you took the time to read my peers’s works as well.

Why I Play by Chris Corbin

Drive by Mario Schulzke

The Journey of Diversity in the Workplace

Marmoset-26.jpg

All Hands, an office life publication, recently interviewed me about my journey in making matters of diversity, equity and inclusivity a priority in my business. We discuss why diversity matters to me, in addition to the challenges I face in moving beyond words and actually putting it into practice. As someone who identifies as a straight, white male of privilege, living in a predominantly white community, I have inherent blind spots and challenges within me -- both as a person and as a leader.  To read the full interview click here.